Use case
Access reviews that produce evidence, not spreadsheets
Auditors don't ask whether you have an access-review policy. They ask for the evidence: who reviewed what, when, what was revoked, and how fast. IamLogic IGA runs certification campaigns that generate that evidence as a by-product of doing the review — no spreadsheet assembly required.
The challenges
What we hear from teams like yours
Spreadsheet certifications
Exports, emails and manual merges consume weeks per cycle and produce evidence auditors distrust.
Rubber-stamp reviews
Reviewers approve everything because they lack context on what an entitlement means.
Revocations that never land
A 'revoke' decision in a spreadsheet doesn't remove access in the target system.
How IamLogic helps
Two products, applied to your problem
Access Manager
- Login and session data gives reviewers usage context — unused access is flagged for removal
- MFA and authentication logs feed the same audit narrative
IamLogic IGA
- Campaigns scoped by application, department, role or risk level
- Reviewer-friendly interface with entitlement descriptions and last-used context
- Revoke decisions execute automatically through connectors or ticketing integration
- Sign-off trails and reports formatted for RBI, SEBI CSCRF, IRDAI, DPDP and ISO 27001 audits
Outcomes
What changes
- Certification cycles measured in days, not quarters
- Revocations that actually deprovision
- One report pack per framework, generated on demand
FAQ
Common questions
How often should we run certifications?
Most regulated customers run quarterly campaigns on high-risk systems and half-yearly on the rest. Campaign templates make the cadence a scheduling decision, not a project.
See IamLogic against your project
Bring your application list and your regulator's last questionnaire — we'll demo against both.